Veteran Bollywood actor Dharmendra has been summoned by the Patiala House Court in Delhi over allegations of cheating and criminal conspiracy in a case involving the Garam Dharam Dhaba franchise. The case highlights a dispute over a business investment and has drawn significant public and legal attention.
Details of the Case
The complainant, Sushil Kumar, a businessman, alleges that he was misled into investing ₹63 lakh in the Garam Dharam Dhaba franchise. According to Kumar, he was promised substantial monthly profits and full support from the franchise’s management team. The investment was reportedly tied to a proposed outlet in Uttar Pradesh, but no progress was made toward its establishment. Kumar further alleges that when he sought updates, his inquiries were ignored, and he was later threatened.
The court, presided over by Judicial Magistrate Yashdeep Chahal, has found enough preliminary evidence to proceed with the case. Dharmendra, along with two others, has been charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including:
- Section 420: Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property
- Section 120B: Criminal conspiracy
- Section 506: Criminal intimidation
- Section 34: Acts done by several persons with a common intent
The next hearing is scheduled for February 20, 2025.
Allegations Against Dharmendra
The complaint revolves around promises made by the accused regarding the franchise’s profitability. Kumar alleges that he was shown inflated turnover figures for existing outlets to secure his investment. The case further claims that the land purchased for the project in Uttar Pradesh remains unused, and commitments for setting up the restaurant were not honored.
Despite police initially treating the matter as a civil dispute, the court has taken a different stance, citing sufficient evidence of potential intent to defraud.
Dharmendra’s Response and Legal Implications
Dharmendra has yet to issue a public statement regarding the allegations. However, the case has sparked conversations about accountability in franchise investments and the responsibilities of celebrity endorsements. Legal experts note that if proven, the charges could have significant repercussions for the actor and his associates.
Impact on Garam Dharam Brand
The Garam Dharam Dhaba franchise, themed around Dharmendra’s iconic Bollywood career, has gained popularity for its rustic ambiance and authentic North Indian cuisine. This controversy, however, raises questions about the management practices and transparency of franchise agreements. The case also underscores the importance of conducting thorough due diligence before entering into investment deals.
overview of news
Details | Information |
---|---|
Court | Patiala House Court, Delhi |
Accused | Dharmendra and two others |
Complainant | Sushil Kumar, businessman |
Allegations | Cheating, criminal conspiracy, and intimidation |
Investment Amount | ₹63 lakh |
Franchise Location | Uttar Pradesh (Amroha) |
Charges | IPC Sections 420, 120B, 506, 34 |
Court Observation | Evidence suggests collective intent to cheat |
Hearing Date | February 20, 2025 |
Judge | Judicial Magistrate Yashdeep Chahal |
Conclusion
This case has put a spotlight on the potential risks of franchise investments, even when associated with a reputable brand or celebrity figure. The upcoming hearings will determine the legal standing of the claims, but it serves as a reminder for investors to remain cautious and well-informed when entering into high-value agreements. The resolution of this case will be closely watched by the business community and Dharmendra’s fans alike.
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings